|
WHY
RESEARCH EXPERIENCE?
|
||
|
...on fait la science avec des faits comme
une maison avec des pierres; mais une
accumulation de faits nest pas plus une science quun tas de pierres nest une maison. ...one builds science with facts, as (one builds) a house with stones. But a collection of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house. Jules Henri Poincaré (Science and Hypothesis, 1908) |
||
|
Any science student learns a lot of facts. But the enterprise of science, as Poincaré stresses earlier in the essay that I quote above, is fundamentally one of doing experiments and making observations, and, equally critical, developing a theory that comprehends the past observations and makes predictions for the outcome of future experiments. That is the enterprise of research. Research is the essence of science. The facts, (by which Poincaré means the things learned by past observations and experiment), and the theories that comprehend these facts are a product of research. Without some knowledge of the process by which these facts and theories were obtained a student cannot know what science is all about, nor distinguish scientific information from myth or speculation. None of us has the time, nor the resources, to reproduce all the experiments and redevelop all of the theories. In learning science one mostly learns just the results, the facts and theories, without learning very much about |
||
|
The iterative
process of interaction between experiment and theory, the uncertainty,
the missteps and wrong guesses, are rarely met.
|
how these results were obtained. Even laboratory classes only scratch the surface of the problem. All too often the experiments have been reduced to rote following of procedure. The iterative process of interaction between experiment and theory, the uncertainty, the missteps and wrong guesses, are rarely met. A research experience allows a student to see the process of science firsthand, to struggle, as researchers must, with the confusion of not knowing what is going on, with the uncertainty and the excitement of a new idea. The student can experience the detectivelike hunt for a clue, for a way to make an experiment work, or for an interpretation of an unexpected outcome. This experience brings the student face to face with issues that do not appear when learning means finding out about what others already know. |
|
|
Some students may perhaps feel that, despite strong interest, they are not quite cut out for a career in science because others in their classes read and understand faster, or do better on the exams. However, once in the research lab, some of these students find that other skills that they possess are more important than those that make it easy to get good grades. Skills in making equipment function, skills in envisaging a change in the setup that will overcome a problem you are experiencing with it, skills in working as part of a team and combining your ideas with those of others; all these are critical in research but seldom tapped in the classroom. The research experience lets a student learn about these skills and demonstrate them too and a letter of recommendation from a research mentor can be the key to admission to a first rate graduate school. |
||
|
Whether the research experience steers the student away from or toward research as a career direction, it will be invaluable. The experience teaches the student things about herself, or himself, and about science, that no classroom can teach. Experience of the process by which scientific results are obtained is valuable for anyone. At some level it needs to be part of basic science education. |
The experience
teaches the student things about herself, or himself, and about science,
that no classroom can teach.
|
|
|
|
||
![]()
Helen Quinn, Ph.D.
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center